Form Your Business in the U.S From Anywhere. Required for U.S. visa sponsorship.
2
Visa
We specialise in long term Founder visas from stealth, YC, to growth stage companies. 98% approval rate
3
Banking
Hassle Free U.S. banking with a startup friendly digital bank. Powered by Aspire.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Beyond Border understands technologists
Went through their O-1 process. Tech domain knowledge is deep. Told me straight up that it’s rare to find a full fledged HRIS platform for SEA - translated really well into my petition.
USCIS reviews O-1 petitions individually to determine whether applicants meet the regulatory criteria and provide sufficient supporting evidence.
»
To qualify for an O-1A visa, documentation must demonstrate sustained national or international recognition in the applicant’s field and satisfy the evidentiary standards set out in the regulations.
»
If eligibility is not clearly established, USCIS may issue a Request for Evidence (RFE). Well-organized documentation reduces the risk of delays.
»
Denials typically occur when the petition fails to establish the required level of acclaim, does not meet the evidentiary criteria, or does not show that the proposed U.S. work falls within the area of extraordinary ability.
»
Each exhibit should be clearly linked to the relevant criterion. Credible, well-documented evidence strengthens the overall petition strategy.
»
Professional guidance from Beyond Border helps structure evidence properly and improves overall petition quality.
O-1A Approval Rate Overview
The O-1A visa maintains one of the highest approval rates among U.S. employment visas at approximately 93-94%.
USCIS O-1 Petition Statistics (FY 2024)
Total O-1 petitions received: 16,224
Total O-1 petitions approved: 14,946
Total O-1 petitions denied: 1,031
Overall approval rate: ~92.1%
Overall denial rate: ~6.4%
Other outcomes (withdrawn/abandoned): ~1.5%
These figures are derived directly from USCIS-published Employer Information System (EIS) performance data for Form I-129 petitions in the O-1 classification and represent the most recent finalized fiscal year outcomes.
Comparison to Other Visas
USCIS Petition Outcome Data by Classification (FY 2024)
H-1B Petitions
Approval rate: ~81%
Denial rate: ~17%
L-1 Petitions
Approval rate: ~78%
Denial rate: ~20%
O-1 Petitions
Approval rate: ~92%
Denial rate: ~6%
EB-1A (Form I-140 Extraordinary Ability)
Approval rate: ~79%
Denial rate: ~18%
Adjudication Basis
O-1 petitions require applicants to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and meet the evidentiary requirements.
L-1 and H-1B petitions involve employer-based eligibility requirements, such as qualifying relationships or specialty-occupation standards.
EB-1A petitions use a permanent residence (green card) standard and follow the rules for immigrant applicants with extraordinary ability.
What Drives High Approval Rates
Eligibility threshold: The extraordinary ability standard requires beneficiaries to demonstrate sustained acclaim and recognition at the national or international level in their field.
USCIS officers review eight evidentiary criteria to determine whether an applicant meets the requirements for this visa category.
Documentary evidence: USCIS evaluates petitions based on the documentation submitted in support of awards, published material, original contributions, critical roles, and other qualifying achievements.
Totality of the evidence: Adjudicators consider the full record to determine whether the beneficiary is among the small percentage at the top of their field.
Area of expertise: The petition must establish that the beneficiary will continue to work in the same field of extraordinary ability in the United States.
O-1 petitions are adjudicated by USCIS Service Centers with jurisdiction over Form I-129 filings.
All Service Centers apply the same statutory and regulatory eligibility criteria when evaluating O-1 petitions.
USCIS officers evaluate whether the petition provides sufficient evidence of the applicant's sustained acclaim and eligibility.
Decisions are based on the entirety of submitted evidence under the extraordinary ability standards.
Service Center assignments do not alter the eligibility standard, as O-1 petitions are evaluated in accordance with USCIS's uniform policy guidance.
Service center assignment isn't controllable, and the differences are minor enough not to significantly affect the chances.
Premium Processing and Petitioner Type
Premium processing offers a 15-day decision period. However, approval rates depend entirely on the quality of the evidence, not on decision speed.
Approval by petitioner type:
O-1 petitions may be filed by U.S. employers or authorized U.S. agents in accordance with USCIS regulatory requirements.
USCIS does not publish approval rates by petitioner type for O-1 classification.
All petitions are evaluated under the same extraordinary ability standard, regardless of whether the filing is made by an employer or agent.
Adjudicators assess if the petition demonstrates the required acclaim and evidentiary criteria.
Approval outcomes depend on the totality of the submitted documentation supporting eligibility under the regulatory framework.
Petitioner type matters less than the quality of the evidence. Strong documentation succeeds regardless of who files.
Common Rejection Reasons
If you understand why petitions fail, you can avoid common mistakes and submit a stronger application.
Failure to Meet the Three Criteria Threshold
Not providing evidence meeting at least three of the eight criteria results in straightforward denial. This happens when applicants submit evidence that's close but doesn't quite meet the definitions, the documentation doesn't clearly show how the evidence meets the criteria, or the evidence is too vague without objective verification.
How to avoid: Carefully review each criterion's requirements. Ensure evidence clearly and objectively demonstrates that you meet specific parameters.
Weak Evidence Quality
Many petitions technically meet three criteria but fail at the final merits determination because the evidence is insufficient.
Indicators of weak evidence: Awards from obscure organizations, publications without established readership, memberships requiring only payment, routine work products as "contributions," roles at organizations without a distinguished reputation, or a salary at the market average.
Focus on the quality of your evidence. Strong evidence for three criteria is better than weak evidence for five or six.
Insufficient National or International Scope
Evidence showing only local or regional recognition doesn't meet the standard requiring national or international acclaim.
Scope issues: Awards from only local organizations; media coverage only in regional publications; impact limited to one company; recognition limited to the immediate circle.
How to avoid: Demonstrate that achievements are recognized across your field nationally or internationally through multiple states/countries, national organizations, or widely-circulated publications.
Lack of Independent Expert Validation
Self-promotion without corroboration from recognized experts leads to denials. Validation problems include the absence of expert recommendation letters, letters from colleagues without distinguished credentials, or claims without expert verification.
Obtain 5-8 letters from recognized experts with distinguished credentials who can credibly attest to your standing in your field and compare you to others.
Internal Recognition Without External Achievement
A strong reputation within one organization, without broader recognition in the field, is insufficient. This includes multiple promotions within a single company, internal awards, or achievements limited to the employer's projects and not adopted externally.
Build recognition for yourself outside your organization by publishing articles, speaking at conferences, winning industry awards, or making contributions that others in your field adopt.
Poorly Structured Petitions
Even strong evidence can be denied if poorly presented. Problems include evidence not clearly organized by criterion, missing context explaining significance, or generic recommendation letters without specific analysis.
Present your evidence clearly with detailed explanations, assuming that USCIS may not know the specifics of your field. Explain why your award is prestigious, why a publication is important, and why each achievement matters.
Other Common Issues
Outdated achievements: Historical accomplishments without sustained recent acclaim suggest extraordinary ability is no longer current. Ensure the evidence spans multiple years and includes recent accomplishments.
Inadequate RFE responses: Not addressing specific USCIS concerns, providing weaker evidence rather than stronger alternatives, or missing deadlines. Treat RFEs seriously and address each point thoroughly.
Don't rush to file as soon as you minimally meet three criteria. Invest 6-12 months building strong evidence with multiple pieces per criterion, national/international recognition clearly documented, independent expert validation, quantifiable impact metrics, and recent sustained achievements.
Obtain Strong Expert Letters
Recommendation letters are crucial. Get letters from nationally/internationally recognized experts with distinguished credentials. Letters should address specific criteria, compare you to others, provide concrete examples, and include the writer's credentials.
Provide Comprehensive Context
Explain everything clearly-don't assume USCIS understands your field. Provide context for award prestige, publication prominence, contribution significance, organization reputation, and compensation comparisons. Include objective evidence like circulation statistics, award documentation, and salary surveys.
Work with a Professional Counselor
Experienced immigration attorneys significantly improve approval odds through knowledge of compelling evidence, effective structuring, identification of weak areas, persuasive drafting, and expertise in responding to RFEs.
Document Everything Thoroughly
Gather comprehensive objective documentation: certificates and official letters, complete publications with data, employment verification, award prestige evidence, adoption metrics and impact data, industry benchmarks for salary, and media coverage with prominence documentation.
Prepare for Potential RFEs
Keep additional evidence in reserve, maintain letter writer relationships, understand which criteria are strongest, have alternatives ready, and respond within deadlines with complete evidence.
We’ve handled this before. We’ll help you handle it now.
Let Beyond Border help you apply lessons from the past to tackle today’s challenges with confidence.
Approximately 15-20% of O-1 petitions receive Requests for Evidence, but this doesn't mean denial is likely.
RFE Success Rates
Of petitions that receive RFEs, approximately 60-70% are ultimately approved after a response. Strong RFE responses that directly address USCIS concerns have higher approval rates than those that provide weaker evidence.
Common RFE Topics
RFEs typically request:
Additional documentation of awards' prestige or publications' prominence
Evidence demonstrating a broader national/international scope
Additional recommendation letters from more credible experts
Detailed documentation of organization reputation and role significance
Comprehensive industry data for compensation comparisons
Effective RFE Response Strategy
Read the RFE carefully to understand exactly what USCIS is asking. Address each point specifically and thoroughly. Provide the exact evidence requested, not something similar. Consider whether alternative criteria might be stronger. Submit on time with an organized presentation.
Professional assistance with RFE responses is valuable, as attorneys have experience understanding what USCIS seeks and how to provide it effectively.
Get Expert Help Maximizing Your Approval Odds
While O-1A approval rates are generally high, proper preparation can make the difference between approval and denial. Beyond Border specializes in preparing O-1A petitions that maximize the likelihood of approval.
The O-1A visa approval rate is approximately 93-94%, meaning roughly 9 out of 10 petitions are ultimately approved.
This includes both initial approvals (78-82%) and approvals following RFEs (Requests for Evidence). About 15-20% of petitions receive RFEs, with 60-70% of those ultimately approved.
How does the O-1A approval rate compare to the H-1B?
O-1A has a slightly higher overall approval rate (93-94%) than H-1B, which ranges from 85-95% for established companies and 50-70% for consulting firms.
O-1A's consistent approval rate reflects an evidence-based evaluation rather than employer-specific factors that affect H-1B approvals.
What's the most common reason for O-1A denial?
The most common reason for denial is failure to meet the final merits determination criteria, specifically insufficient evidence of extraordinary ability.
Other common reasons include insufficient national/international scope, lack of independent expert validation, and weak evidence quality despite meeting criterion definitions.
Does premium processing affect O-1A approval rates?
No. Premium processing guarantees 15-day adjudication but doesn't affect the likelihood of approval. Petitions filed with premium processing have the same approval rates as those filed with standard processing. Evidence quality determines outcome, not processing speed.
What percentage of O-1A petitions receive RFEs?
Approximately 15-20% of O-1A petitions receive Requests for Evidence. Of those receiving RFEs, about 60-70% are ultimately approved after providing additional documentation.
RFEs indicate USCIS needs clarification or additional evidence, not necessarily that your case will be denied.
Can I improve my chances if I've been denied before?
Yes. If you receive a denial, you can reapply after strengthening your evidence. Many applicants successfully obtain O-1A on their second or third attempts after building additional achievements, obtaining stronger expert letters, or better documenting their qualifications. Learn from the reasons for denial and address the specific weaknesses they reveal.
How important are recommendation letters for approval?
Very important. Strong letters of recommendation from recognized experts provide crucial validation of your extraordinary ability.
Letters should address specific criteria, compare you to others in the field, and come from credible sources with distinguished credentials. Weak or generic letters contribute to denials even when other evidence is strong.
What success rate do first-time applicants have?
First-time O-1A applicants have approval rates around 90-92%, slightly lower than the overall 93-94% rate.
This indicates a lower level of familiarity with the requirements, but well-prepared first-time petitions still have very high success rates. Working with experienced immigration counsel helps first-time applicants achieve approval rates comparable to repeat filers.
Are certain fields easier to get O-1A approval?
All fields can achieve high approval rates with proper documentation.
Sciences and athletics tend to have slightly higher approval rates (94-96%) because achievements are often measured objectively.
Business can be slightly more challenging (91-93%) as accomplishments may be harder to document objectively. The field matters less than the quality of the evidence and the documentation.
How can I determine whether my evidence is sufficient before filing?
Consult with an experienced immigration attorney for an honest assessment of your evidence against O-1A standards.
Attorneys can evaluate whether your evidence clearly meets the criteria, has sufficient national/international scope, and demonstrates extraordinary ability convincingly. Professional assessment before filing helps identify weaknesses and improve the likelihood of approval.
Struggling with your U.S. visa process? We can help.
.png)
