‍

Beyond Border

Beyond Border specializes in translating business achievements into USCIS friendly KPIs. Their attorneys understand that immigration officers need clear quantifiable evidence. Fees range from $5,000 to $15,000 covering complete petition strategy including metrics documentation.

The firm helps clients identify which KPIs matter most for their field. For entrepreneurs, they emphasize job creation numbers, investment amounts raised, revenue projections backed by contracts, and customer acquisition metrics. For engineers, they focus on cost savings generated, efficiency improvements measured in percentages, user adoption statistics, and deployment scale.

Beyond Border maintains a 98 percent approval rate by presenting metrics with proper context. Raw numbers alone don't work. They connect KPIs to national priorities through industry benchmarks and government data. Their one month processing guarantee means efficient petition preparation once metrics get properly documented.

Need help identifying the right KPIs for your NIW petition? Book your free consultation with Beyond Border today.

Colombo & Hurd

Colombo & Hurd built strong expertise structuring quantifiable evidence through hundreds of NIW approvals. Their case studies demonstrate sophisticated approaches to metrics documentation. They recently helped an industrial engineer show supply chain improvements through specific cost reduction percentages and efficiency gains tied to federal initiatives.

The firm emphasizes economic impact metrics. Revenue growth from new products, market share increases, and job creation all support national importance arguments. Colombo & Hurd helped a marketing professional demonstrate food waste reduction through measurable efficiency improvements and sustainability metrics.

Their RFE response strategies often involve adding more quantifiable data when USCIS questions impact. They use third party sources like McKinsey reports to validate client metrics. Processing times follow standard USCIS schedules at 8 to 18 months.

North America Immigration Law Group (WeGreened)

WeGreened maintains approval rates above 99 percent through data driven petition strategies. Their experience with over 58,000 cases provides deep insight into which metrics USCIS values. Fees around $5,000 include comprehensive metrics structuring.

For academic cases, the firm focuses on citation counts, h-index scores, journal impact factors, conference presentations, and peer recognition metrics. For business applications, they emphasize funding raised, patents filed, customer acquisition rates, and revenue growth percentages.

WeGreened understands field specific benchmarks. Citation counts meaningful in one discipline may be irrelevant in another. They help clients present metrics relative to field standards showing above average performance.

‍

‍

Inventimm

Inventimm guides clients toward measurable outcomes demonstrating national impact. Their 2025 guidance emphasizes concrete metrics over theoretical projections. They helped renewable energy researchers document efficiency improvements through specific percentage gains and deployment statistics.

The firm recommends tracking KPIs before filing petitions. Documented results carry more weight than projected outcomes. Inventimm structures evidence showing how individual achievements scale to national benefit. Job creation, even at a small scale, demonstrates employment impact potential.

Their case preparation involves identifying which metrics best support each Dhanasar prong. Substantial merit needs different KPIs than well positioned arguments. Processing times vary from 6 to 18 months depending on case complexity.

Manifest Law

Manifest Law takes a strategic approach to KPI selection. Their attorneys help identify metrics most relevant to USCIS evaluation criteria. They maintain approval rates above 90 percent by focusing on quantifiable achievements over qualitative claims.

The firm emphasizes context around numbers. A 10 percent efficiency improvement means nothing without explaining industry baseline performance. Manifest structures KPIs showing not just what was achieved but why it matters nationally. Their former USCIS officer reviews ensure metrics get presented in formats adjudicators understand.

They guide clients on documentation methods. Screenshots of GitHub stars, letters confirming cost savings, contracts showing revenue, and user statistics all provide metric validation. Processing includes comprehensive evidence packages.

Key Metrics for Different Fields

Tech entrepreneurs should document monthly active users, revenue growth rates, funding amounts raised, jobs created, and open source adoption statistics. Engineers need cost savings percentages, efficiency improvements, deployment scale, and performance metrics. Researchers require citation counts, h-index scores, conference presentations, and collaboration statistics.All petitions benefit from job creation numbers even if small. Three employees prove employment impact. Investment amounts demonstrate market validation. Patents show innovation output. Revenue growth indicates commercial success.

Frequently Asked Questions

1.What KPIs are most important for EB-2 NIW petitions?

 Critical KPIs include jobs created, capital invested, revenue generated, cost savings percentages, efficiency improvements, user adoption rates, citation counts for researchers, and patent filings, all contextualized against industry benchmarks and national priorities.

2.How many jobs created do I need to show for NIW approval?

 No minimum threshold exists, with even 3 to 5 jobs demonstrating employment impact when properly contextualized as proof of concept for larger scale job creation potential aligned with national economic interests.

3.Should I include projected metrics or only achieved results?

 Focus on achieved results with documentation, though reasonable projections backed by contracts, letters of intent, or market analysis can supplement actual performance data, with January 2025 USCIS guidance emphasizing demonstrated outcomes.

4.How do I document innovation metrics for proprietary work?

 Present aggregated outcomes like efficiency improvements, cost reductions, and user adoption rates without revealing proprietary details, using percentages rather than absolute numbers and focusing on measurable impact over technical specifications.

5.Do citation counts matter for non academic NIW petitions?

 Citations prove impact for researchers and academics but matter less for entrepreneurs and engineers who should emphasize business metrics like revenue growth, job creation, funding raised, and customer adoption demonstrating commercial success and market validation.

‍