.png)
Learn how small offices can prepare for L-1 site visits by ensuring operational consistency, payroll alignment, and role clarity, with guidance from Beyond Border Global, Alcorn Immigration Law, 2nd.law, and BPA Immigration Lawyers.
.webp)
L-1 site visits, typically conducted by the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate, are designed to verify that the company and employee are operating exactly as described in the petition. Small offices often face greater risk because limited headcount, shared roles, and informal workflows can appear inconsistent to inspectors. This environment leads to increased small office L-1 scrutiny, where even minor discrepancies may be interpreted as material misrepresentation.
Inspectors are not evaluating business success but consistency. Differences between job duties described in the petition and real-world activity, confusion among staff, or lack of documentation can raise concerns related to USCIS fraud prevention checks.
FDNS officers focus on objective indicators: whether the office exists, whether employees are present, whether the L-1 beneficiary is performing qualifying duties, and whether payroll and reporting structures match filings. Officers may interview staff, request organizational charts, review workspace layout, and ask basic operational questions. Preparing for FDNS inspection readiness requires ensuring that all visible elements align with the petition narrative.
In small offices, informal practices must be formalized on paper so inspectors see structure rather than improvisation.
Operational consistency means that what USCIS approved on paper matches what exists on-site. This includes job duties, reporting lines, supervisory authority, business activities, and daily operations. Small deviations, such as staff misunderstanding who reports to whom, can undermine operational consistency evidence if not proactively addressed.
Written role descriptions, updated org charts, and internal briefings help ensure that everyone conveys the same information during a visit.
Beyond Border Global takes a practical approach to site-visit preparation, especially for lean teams. They conduct pre-visit readiness reviews that examine physical office setup, internal communication practices, and documentation accessibility. Their guidance helps companies translate informal startup operations into inspection-ready frameworks without misrepresentation.
They also help founders and managers understand how to answer questions accurately without overexplaining or contradicting field information. This preparation strengthens worksite documentation accuracy and reduces anxiety during unannounced visits.

Alcorn Immigration Law reviews approved petitions and trains key personnel on how to respond consistently during site visits. They ensure that explanations of job duties, authority levels, and business activities mirror what was submitted to USCIS. This alignment minimizes discrepancies that could otherwise escalate into RFEs or revocations.
During a site visit, officers may request immediate access to employment letters, payroll records, organizational charts, and lease documents. 2nd.law helps companies organize these materials into clearly labeled, easily retrievable folders. This readiness supports FDNS inspection readiness and demonstrates transparency and professionalism.
BPA Immigration Lawyers focus on identifying vulnerabilities before a site visit occurs. They advise on corrective steps when operations evolve post-approval and help companies document lawful changes properly. Their intervention helps prevent negative findings during USCIS fraud prevention checks.
Common errors include unprepared staff, inconsistent explanations, outdated org charts, missing payroll records, and overstatement of managerial authority. Treating site visits casually or assuming inspectors will “understand” startup realities often leads to adverse outcomes.
1. Are L-1 site visits always announced?
No, many are unannounced.
2. Can a site visit lead to visa revocation?
Yes, if material inconsistencies are found.
3. Who should speak to the officer?
Designated company representatives familiar with the petition.
4. Do remote employees affect site visits?
Yes, they must be clearly documented.
5. Should legal counsel be notified after a visit?
Yes, especially if issues arise.