Understanding i-140 Priority Date Backlog for Indian and Chinese Nationals

The i-140 priority date backlog for Indian and Chinese nationals represents the most significant bottleneck in the United States employment-based immigration system. Priority dates establish your place in line for visa number allocation, typically corresponding to your PERM labor certification filing date for employer-sponsored cases or i-140 filing date for self-petitioned categories. Even after USCIS approves your i-140 petition confirming you meet all eligibility requirements, you cannot proceed to final green card stages until visa numbers become available for your specific priority date, employment category, and country of birth.

Immigration law imposes per-country limitations capping any single nation at seven percent of total annual employment-based visa allocations regardless of demand levels. With approximately 140,000 employment-based visas available yearly across all categories and countries, this seven percent cap means roughly 9,800 visas maximum per country annually. India and China generate far more employment-based demand than this cap accommodates, creating multi-year and often multi-decade backlogs. The disparity becomes especially pronounced in EB-2 and EB-3 categories where most employer-sponsored petitions concentrate, while EB-1 extraordinary ability and multinational executive categories see less demand pressure allowing relatively current priority dates even for heavily backlogged countries.

‍

‍

Current State of India Priority Date Backlogs in 2025

Indian-born applicants endure the most extreme i-140 priority date backlog for Indian and Chinese nationals with the EB-2 advanced degree category showing priority dates stuck around 2012-2013 as of early 2025. This creates waiting periods exceeding 12-13 years from initial PERM filing to green card availability, with projections suggesting current filers may face 15-20 year total waits under present conditions. The backlog affects tens of thousands of Indian professionals working primarily in technology, engineering, and healthcare sectors who remain trapped in prolonged temporary visa status unable to change employers freely or pursue entrepreneurial opportunities.

India's EB-3 skilled worker category faces even worse conditions with priority dates frequently retrogressing to 2009-2011, translating to 14-16 year waits from filing to adjustment eligibility. The severe retrogression creates cascading problems including children aging out of derivative beneficiary eligibility before families receive green cards, forcing parents to pursue separate immigration pathways for children or face family separation. Many Indian applicants initially filed in EB-2 categories attempt downgrading to EB-3 when those priority dates advance ahead of EB-2 through interfiling, only to discover EB-3 conditions worsened substantially in recent years.

India EB-1 category provides the sole realistic employment-based pathway with consistently current or near-current priority dates during most months. This stark contrast drives many Indian professionals toward EB-1A extraordinary ability self-petitions or EB-2 NIW national interest waivers despite higher qualification thresholds, since avoiding decade-plus backlogs justifies substantial additional credential development and documentation efforts. The dramatic disparity between EB-1 and other categories for Indian applicants makes initial category selection critically important to long-term immigration success and career flexibility. Beyond Border specializes in evaluating Indian applicants' credentials to identify potential EB-1 or EB-2 NIW qualification paths that many professionals overlook, providing strategic alternatives to traditional employer-sponsored routes facing insurmountable backlogs.

China Priority Date Backlog Patterns and Trends

Chinese nationals experience significant but less catastrophic i-140 priority date backlog for Indian and Chinese nationals compared to India across employment-based categories. As of 2025, China EB-2 priority dates hover around 2018-2019, creating wait times of approximately 5-6 years from filing to green card availability. While substantial enough to complicate career planning and family decisions, these delays remain far more manageable than India's decade-plus waits, allowing Chinese applicants to maintain some reasonable expectations about eventual timeline horizons.

China EB-3 category shows similar backlog intensity with priority dates in the 2017-2018 range, translating to 6-7 year waiting periods that fluctuate based on annual visa number availability and filing volume variations. Chinese professionals benefit from somewhat lower per-country demand relative to India despite China's massive population, since proportionally fewer Chinese nationals pursue US employment-based immigration compared to India's heavy concentration in American technology and professional services sectors. However, backlogs still create meaningful challenges including extended H-1B dependency, limitations on job mobility, and uncertainty about long-term settlement timelines.

China EB-1 extraordinary ability and multinational executive categories maintain relatively current priority dates or experience only brief retrogression periods of 6-12 months, making them strategically valuable pathways for qualified applicants. Chinese professionals with strong publication records, patents, leadership roles, or entrepreneurial achievements increasingly pursue EB-1A self-petitions to bypass multi-year EB-2 and EB-3 backlogs. The EB-2 NIW pathway also gains popularity among Chinese researchers, technology innovators, and business professionals whose work advances United States national interests, providing self-petition flexibility without extraordinary ability threshold requirements. Priority date progression for China shows more month-to-month volatility than rest of world categories but demonstrates better predictability and shorter absolute wait times than India, allowing applicants to monitor visa bulletins and adjust strategies based on observed movement patterns over 12-18 month periods.

Comparing Backlog Severity Between India and China

Direct comparison of i-140 priority date backlog for Indian and Chinese nationals reveals India faces approximately 2-3 times longer waiting periods than China across EB-2 and EB-3 categories. Where Chinese EB-2 applicants wait 5-6 years, Indian counterparts endure 12-15 years or more. This disparity stems from India generating proportionally higher employment-based immigration demand relative to the seven percent per-country cap, particularly in technology sectors where Indian professionals represent substantial portions of H-1B visa holders seeking permanent residency pathways.

Statistical analysis shows India accounts for roughly 70-75 percent of employment-based green card demand in EB-2 and EB-3 categories combined, while the per-country cap allows only seven percent of visas annually. This fundamental supply-demand imbalance creates mathematical impossibility of clearing backlogs under current law without either dramatically increasing visa number allocations or eliminating per-country caps entirely. China generates approximately 15-20 percent of employment-based demand, still exceeding the seven percent cap but by smaller margins allowing somewhat more manageable if still substantial backlogs.

Both countries benefit equally from EB-1 category availability, demonstrating the strategic value of pursuing higher preference categories when credentials support qualification. The similarity in EB-1 conditions despite vastly different EB-2 and EB-3 backlogs emphasizes how demand concentration in specific categories rather than overall immigration volume drives backlog severity. Indian and Chinese applicants both show increasing interest in the EB-5 investor category as an alternative pathway, though the $800,000 minimum investment creates accessibility barriers for many professionals. Some applicants explore dependent spouse employment-based petitions when spouses possess independent qualification pathways, effectively creating two separate priority dates that may advance at different rates. Beyond Border helps Indian and Chinese clients evaluate comprehensive strategy portfolios including multiple petition types, interfiling options, dependent beneficiary alternatives, and legislative change monitoring to maximize chances of achieving permanent residency within reasonable timeframes despite severe systemic backlogs.

Strategic Solutions and Alternative Pathways

Facing a severe i-140 priority date backlog for Indian and Chinese nationals, applicants must consider creative strategies beyond traditional employer-sponsored EB-2 and EB-3 routes. EB-1A extraordinary ability self-petitions offer the most powerful alternative for qualified professionals, requiring evidence of sustained national or international acclaim through awards, publications, media coverage, or significant contributions to their fields. Many Indian and Chinese technology professionals, researchers, business leaders, and specialized professionals possess stronger credentials than they realize, making comprehensive EB-1A evaluation worthwhile even when prospects initially seem uncertain.

EB-2 NIW national interest waivers provide another valuable pathway eliminating employer sponsorship and labor certification requirements while maintaining EB-2 classification. Entrepreneurs, researchers, healthcare professionals, and innovators whose work benefits United States national interests can self-petition under NIW standards often proving more accessible than EB-1A extraordinary ability thresholds. While NIW petitions still face EB-2 priority date backlogs for Indian applicants, the self-petition flexibility and elimination of employer dependency provide valuable career mobility advantages during extended waiting periods.

EB-5 immigrant investor category offers an immediate permanent residency pathway requiring $800,000 minimum investment in targeted employment areas or $1,050,000 elsewhere, bypassing employment-based backlogs entirely through separate visa number allocation. Regional center investments allow passive participation where investors need not manage businesses directly, making EB-5 accessible to professionals with capital but limited entrepreneurial experience. For Indian families facing child aging out concerns, EB-5 can provide green cards before children reach 21, preserving family unity that employment-based backlogs threaten.

Dependent spouse employment-based petitions create dual-track strategies where both spouses pursue separate i-140 approvals, effectively doubling priority date opportunities since only one needs to advance for family adjustment eligibility. Interfiling between EB-2 and EB-3 categories when one advances ahead of the other provides tactical flexibility, though recent trends show EB-3 retrogression eliminating previous advantages this strategy offered Indian applicants. Some families pursue parents' naturalization citizenship to sponsor adult children through family-based categories, though this option applies only when parents already have green cards or citizenship. Beyond Border develops comprehensive multi-pathway strategies for Indian and Chinese clients recognizing that single-track approaches rarely optimize outcomes given severe backlog conditions requiring creative, proactive, and sustained effort across multiple potential immigration routes.

FAQ

How long do Indian nationals wait for EB-2 green cards?

i-140 priority date backlog for Indian and Chinese nationals shows India EB-2 applicants facing 12-15 year waits from filing to green card availability as of 2025, with current filers potentially waiting 15-20 years under present conditions.

Are Chinese backlogs as severe as India backlogs?

No, Chinese nationals experience 5-6 year EB-2 waits compared to India's 12-15 years, though China still faces substantial backlogs significantly longer than rest of world applicants who typically see current priority dates.

Which category offers fastest green cards for Indians?

EB-1 category provides the fastest pathway with current or near-current priority dates for Indian applicants, making EB-1A extraordinary ability or EB-1C multinational executive options strategically valuable despite higher qualification requirements.

Can I switch from EB-3 to EB-2 to get a faster priority date?

You can file a new EB-2 petition and potentially port your earlier EB-3 priority date through interfiling, though for Indian applicants EB-2 currently shows worse retrogression than EB-3, making category switching less beneficial than historically.

What causes the i-140 priority date backlog for Indian and Chinese nationals?

Per-country caps limiting any nation to seven percent of annual employment-based visas create backlogs when India and China generate demand far exceeding this allocation, with India producing roughly 70-75 percent of EB-2 and EB-3 demand.

‍