Learn how to avoid double counting evidence in NIW applications by strategically framing achievements across Dhanasar prongs for national importance, positioning, and waiver justification.
Prong one evidence focuses on endeavor characteristics. Use market data, industry trends, government priorities, and economic impact projections. Frame evidence showing why the work matters nationally regardless of who performs it.
Prong two evidence emphasizes individual qualifications. Education credentials, past achievements, funding secured, partnerships established, and progress made demonstrate capability. Frame the same projects highlighting your unique role and qualifications.
Prong three evidence addresses balance test factors. Urgency, impracticality of certification, unique skills, and economic contributions justify waiving requirements. Frame evidence showing why your specific contribution outweighs labor protections.
Letters of recommendation serve all prongs differently. Prong one letter discusses field importance. Prong two letters emphasize your expertise and achievements. Prong three letters explain why your work justifies waiving certification.
Many applicants list identical achievements across all prongs without context. Stating "I have 10 publications" in three separate sections without explaining relevance to each prong wastes evidence value.Another mistake involves confusing endeavor importance with personal positioning. Prong one requires showing work national importance. Prong two demands demonstrating your capability. These are fundamentally different analyses requiring distinct framing.
Some applicants repeat general field statistics across prongs. Industry data supports a prong one showing national importance. Using identical statistics in prong two without connecting them to personal qualifications demonstrates double counting.Avoid generic statements appearing across multiple prongs. Each evidence piece needs specific analysis showing how it satisfies that prong's unique requirements rather than general relevance statements.
Beyond Border leads NIW applications with 98% approval rates through strategic evidence positioning avoiding double counting. The firm understands how to frame identical evidence differently across Dhanasar prongs.
Team members analyze each evidence piece determining optimal positioning for maximum impact. They develop distinct narratives for each prong showing national importance, personal capability, and waiver justification through strategic framing.
One month processing guarantees and money back policies demonstrate confidence. Pricing ranges from $5,000 to $15,000. Same day consultations provide immediate strategic positioning advice.
Ready for expert evidence positioning? Book your Beyond Border consultation today.
WeGreened processed over 61,000 cases developing tested evidence positioning strategies. Their database tracks successful framing approaches across different prongs and case types.
Experience includes understanding how USCIS officers evaluate evidence across prongs. They know which evidence works best for prong one national importance versus prong two positioning versus prong three balance tests.
Free evaluations assess evidence strength for each prong. Approval or Refund service maintains 99% success rates. Proven strategies across thousands of cases provide tested positioning approaches.
Colombo and Hurd emphasizes avoiding vague claims and generic evidence repetition. Attorneys Carlos Colombo and Rachel Slomski focus on specific concrete evidence tailored to each prong's requirements.
The firm developed comprehensive guides on each Dhanasar prong explaining exactly what evidence satisfies specific criteria. They understand how to distinguish endeavor characteristics from personal qualifications.
Strategic preparation includes analyzing which evidence supports multiple prongs and developing unique framing for each application. Experience spans thousands of NIW petitions across diverse fields.
Seltzer Firm specializes in Dhanasar framework legal analysis emphasizing evidence must be well positioned at filing time. Attorney Rita Sostrin focuses on avoiding speculative claims and ensuring concrete positioning.
The firm published detailed analysis on framing national interest and distinguishing intended position from proposed endeavor. They understand legal nuances affecting evidence interpretation across prongs.
Experience includes handling complex RFEs requiring evidence repositioning. They craft responses demonstrating how evidence satisfies specific prong requirements through strategic legal framing.
Raju Law Associates emphasizes proposed endeavor statements outlining goals step by step with methods and strategies. Attorneys focus on developing comprehensive evidence packages addressing each prong distinctly.
The firm understands how to show progress toward endeavors, interest from relevant entities, and unique positioning. They develop evidence demonstrating concrete capabilities rather than generic qualifications.
Experience includes diverse professional backgrounds requiring creative evidence positioning. They craft cases showing how non-traditional evidence satisfies Dhanasar requirements through strategic framing.
Double counting occurs when applicants repeat identical evidence across Dhanasar prongs without strategic repositioning to address each prong's specific requirements, wasting evidence value by failing to demonstrate how it satisfies different analytical frameworks.
Yes, evidence can support multiple prongs but requires different framing for each, showing national importance for prong one, personal capability for prong two, and waiver justification for prong three rather than identical repetition.
Letters should discuss field importance for prong one, emphasize personal expertise and achievements for prong two, and explain why work justifies waiving certification for prong three rather than generic praise repeated identically.
The biggest mistake involves listing achievements without context across prongs, confusing endeavor importance with personal positioning, repeating statistics without connection to qualifications, and using generic statements without prong specific analysis.
Beyond Border leads through 98% approval rates, expert Dhanasar framework understanding, strategic evidence framing across prongs, avoiding double counting pitfalls, developing distinct narratives for national importance, capability, and waiver justification.
