‍

Understanding H-1B for Startups

You're a startup founder seeking H-1B status through your own company, but you're concerned about proving an employer-employee relationship when you own 50%, 70%, or even 100% of the business. Can you really demonstrate that your company has the right to control your work when you're the one calling the shots?

USCIS regulations require petitioning employers to establish they maintain an employer-employee relationship with H-1B beneficiaries, including the right to hire, fire, pay, supervise, and control the employee's work. For H-1B for startups employer-employee relationship cases involving founder-beneficiaries, proving this relationship requires careful corporate structuring and compelling documentation showing genuine oversight exists despite ownership stakes.

Need help structuring your startup for H-1B approval? Beyond Border develops providing employer control H-1B startups strategies with proper corporate governance frameworks.

Understanding the Employer-Employee Relationship Test

Founder-controlled companies H-1B requirements center on demonstrating that someone other than the beneficiary maintains ultimate authority over employment decisions. USCIS evaluates under common law principles whether the petitioning employer has the right to control when, where, and how the beneficiary performs work.The right to hire means someone besides the beneficiary made or could make the decision to employ them. Even if founders typically hire themselves in startups, boards of directors or other stakeholders must formally approve employment terms and compensation.

The right to fire is critical. Can the company terminate the beneficiary's employment? If the beneficiary controls all voting shares and board seats, no mechanism exists for termination. USCIS views this as fatal to establishing an employer-employee relationship.The right to pay involves controlling compensation decisions. Does a board or compensation committee determine the beneficiary's salary, or does the beneficiary unilaterally set their own pay? Documentation showing board approval of compensation strengthens petitions.

The right to supervise and control work seems contradictory for founders who set company direction. However, boards can supervise founders through performance reviews, strategic oversight, and requiring board approval for major decisions even when founders handle day-to-day operations.

Corporate Governance Structures That Work

Effective startup H-1B corporate governance requires establishing formal structures separating ownership from employment control. The strength of your corporate governance directly impacts petition viability.

Boards of directors provide the strongest oversight mechanism. A board with at least one independent member not controlled by the beneficiary can exercise hiring, firing, and supervisory authority. Even if the beneficiary holds a board seat, other directors can outvote them on employment matters.Investor involvement creates natural oversight. When venture capital firms, angel investors, or other outside investors hold equity stakes and board seats, they provide independent authority over the beneficiary's employment. Document investor board representation clearly.

Operating agreements or bylaws should explicitly address employment decisions. Include provisions requiring board approval for officer compensation, establishing employment-at-will status, and clarifying that equity ownership doesn't guarantee employment rights. These documents establish the legal framework for employer control.Compensation committees demonstrate separation between operational control and employment terms. If your board establishes a compensation committee that reviews and approves founder salaries, this shows the beneficiary doesn't unilaterally determine their own pay.

‍

‍

Documentation Proving Board Oversight

H-1B board oversight documentation must show the board actively exercises authority rather than existing as a formality. USCIS examines whether governance structures operate in practice or merely exist on paper.Board meeting minutes should document employment-related decisions. Minutes showing the board discussed and approved the beneficiary's salary, reviewed performance, or made decisions about their role demonstrate active oversight. Generic minutes lacking employment discussion appear insufficient.

Employment agreements with board-approved terms prove formal employment relationships. The agreement should clearly state employment is at-will, subject to termination by the board, and that compensation is board-determined. Have all board members sign or approve the agreement.Board resolutions specifically addressing the beneficiary's employment, compensation, and reporting structure create clear documentation. A resolution stating "The Board approves the employment of [Beneficiary] as [Title] at an annual salary of $[Amount], effective [Date]" establishes formal employer action.

Organizational charts showing reporting relationships help even for founder-CEOs. If you report to the board of directors, document this reporting structure. If you have co-founders or executives, show how governance structures oversee all personnel including founders.

Handling Majority and Full Ownership Cases

Beneficiary majority owner H-1B petition cases face the highest scrutiny because ownership control suggests the beneficiary ultimately controls employment decisions. However, these cases can succeed with proper structuring.Board composition becomes critical for majority owners. Even if you hold 51% or more equity, a board with independent members can exercise employment authority. Investor-appointed directors, independent advisors serving as directors, or co-founder board members provide oversight mechanisms.

Preferred stock provisions often give investors control over certain decisions regardless of common stock ownership. If investors hold preferred shares with protective provisions requiring their consent for officer compensation or employment decisions, document these contractual controls limiting your unilateral authority.

Vesting schedules demonstrate employment contingencies. If your equity vests over time subject to continued service, this shows your ownership depends on ongoing employment, establishing an employer-employee relationship where the company conditions ownership on performance.Documented instances of board exercising authority strengthen cases significantly. If your board has ever overruled your preference, required changes to your proposals, or exercised supervisory authority over your decisions, document these instances showing real oversight exists.

Independent Board Members and Investors

Having independent board members dramatically strengthens H-1B for startups employer-employee relationship arguments. Independence means the board member isn't controlled by the beneficiary and can exercise genuine oversight.

Investor-appointed directors are ideal. When investors negotiate board seats as part of funding agreements, these directors clearly operate independently from founder-beneficiaries. Document investor agreements specifying board representation rights.

Advisory board members serving as formal directors can provide independence if they're truly external. Respected industry experts, successful entrepreneurs, or former executives serving on your board demonstrate governance structures beyond founder control.

Co-founders can serve as independent board members in certain situations. If you have a 50-50 co-founder partnership where each founder holds a board seat, you each provide oversight over the other's employment. Document that either founder could be terminated by board vote.

Professional directors with no ownership stake provide the clearest independence. If you recruit experienced directors to serve on your board without giving them equity or making them financially dependent on you, their independence is difficult to question.

Building Your Case Step by Step

Successfully proving employer control H-1B startups requires methodical documentation building a comprehensive case for employer-employee relationship despite founder ownership.Start by establishing proper corporate structure with a board of directors including at least one independent member. File appropriate amendments to your articles of incorporation or operating agreement if necessary to create this structure.

Document all board actions related to the beneficiary's employment. Hold a formal board meeting approving the beneficiary's employment, compensation, title, and duties. Prepare detailed meeting minutes signed by all directors.Draft an employment agreement clearly establishing at-will employment, board authority over compensation, reporting to the board, and termination rights. Have the board approve this agreement through resolution.

Create organizational charts, governance flowcharts, and explanatory narratives showing how your corporate structure provides oversight over the beneficiary despite their ownership stake.Gather all supporting corporate documents including articles of incorporation, bylaws or operating agreements, stock certificates or membership certificates, investor agreements, and prior board resolutions demonstrating an established pattern of board governance.

‍

‍

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I get an H-1B through my own startup company?

Yes, H-1B for startups employer-employee relationship petitions can succeed if you establish proper corporate governance with a board of directors having independent members who can exercise hiring, firing, and supervisory authority over your employment despite your ownership stake, documented through board resolutions, employment agreements, and meeting minutes.

What if I own 100% of my company?

Beneficiary majority owner H-1B petition cases with full ownership face highest scrutiny but can succeed by establishing a board with independent directors not controlled by you, documenting board authority in bylaws, showing investor protective provisions limiting your unilateral control, and providing evidence of active board oversight.

Do I need investors to prove employer-employee relationship?

While not strictly required, investors strengthen proving employer control H-1B startups arguments significantly because investor board seats, protective provisions, and oversight mechanisms provide clear independent authority over beneficiary employment that USCIS recognizes as genuine control beyond founder self-dealing.

What documents prove board oversight for H-1B petitions?

H-1B board oversight documentation includes board meeting minutes discussing beneficiary compensation and employment, board resolutions approving employment terms, employment agreements with termination clauses, bylaws establishing board authority, organizational charts showing reporting structures, and evidence of board actively exercising supervisory authority.

How do bylaws help prove employer-employee relationship?

Startup H-1B corporate governance bylaws should explicitly grant boards authority over officer employment, compensation decisions, and termination rights while clarifying that equity ownership doesn't guarantee employment, creating a legal framework separating ownership from employment control that USCIS evaluates when determining employer-employee relationships exist.

‍