‍

Why EB-1C is harder when the U.S. entity is new

EB-1C petitions face heightened scrutiny when the U.S. entity is recently formed because USCIS must be convinced that a true managerial or executive role already exists, or will exist imminently. Officers are skeptical of paper-only structures that lack operational depth. For new offices, USCIS evaluates whether the organization can realistically support an executive role without the beneficiary performing routine tasks. This is where USCIS EB-1C scrutiny intensifies.
A credible staffing plan must therefore bridge the present and near future, demonstrating how the company transitions from early execution to layered management. Unsupported optimism or generic hiring promises often lead to RFEs or denials.

What USCIS expects from a credible staffing plan

USCIS looks for specificity, sequencing, and feasibility. A persuasive plan identifies concrete roles, reporting lines, and timing, showing how each hire removes operational burden from the executive. Titles alone are insufficient; the plan must explain functions, responsibilities, and how authority is delegated. This level of detail supports future managerial capacity proof.
Importantly, USCIS evaluates whether hiring projections align with revenue, capitalization, and business activity. Staffing plans must make operational sense, not just immigration sense.

Designing a staffing roadmap that looks real

An effective roadmap outlines phased hiring over 12–36 months, tied to business milestones such as product launch, client onboarding, or market expansion. Early hires typically cover operations, sales, or technical execution, followed by supervisors or managers. This sequencing shows organizational growth roadmap logic rather than abstract planning.
Each role should clearly reduce the executive’s involvement in day-to-day tasks, reinforcing that the beneficiary’s primary function is strategic oversight.

How Beyond Border Global builds staffing credibility

Beyond Border Global works closely with founders to convert business plans into staffing narratives USCIS finds believable. Their approach emphasizes operational causality, why each hire is necessary, how it changes the executive’s daily focus, and how authority flows through the organization. Rather than inflating headcount, they focus on role substance, reporting logic, and timing grounded in actual business capacity.
By aligning staffing projections with revenue models, capitalization, and market strategy, Beyond Border Global strengthens executive staffing plan credibility and reduces the risk of USCIS viewing the plan as speculative. Their narratives explicitly connect hiring decisions to executive-level responsibilities, making the managerial role tangible even in early-stage entities.

‍

‍

How Alcorn Immigration Law aligns staffing plans with EB-1C law

Alcorn Immigration Law ensures that staffing plans meet regulatory definitions of executive and managerial capacity. They refine role descriptions, reporting structures, and delegation language so the plan satisfies employment-based immigrant criteria rather than appearing aspirational. Their review helps eliminate inconsistencies that could undermine credibility.

How 2nd.law structures hiring evidence

Staffing plans often include org charts, hiring timelines, payroll projections, and job descriptions. 2nd.law organizes these materials into clear, phased exhibits that show progression from startup execution to management-led operations. This structure allows adjudicators to quickly grasp how the organization will function.

How BPA Immigration Lawyers mitigate RFE risk

BPA Immigration Lawyers identify common weaknesses in new-office EB-1C cases, such as unrealistic timelines or vague roles. Their review helps applicants adjust plans before filing, reducing the likelihood of RFEs tied to staffing credibility.

Common mistakes in new-entity EB-1C staffing plans

Applicants often overpromise headcount, under-explain delegation, or rely on future hires without operational justification. Staffing plans must be grounded, consistent, and clearly linked to executive function.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can a one-employee U.S. entity qualify for EB-1C?
Yes, if a credible near-term staffing plan is documented.
2. Do hires need to be completed before filing?
No, but timelines must be realistic.
3. Are contractors acceptable?
Sometimes, if their roles reduce executive execution.
4. How far into the future can plans extend?
Typically 1–3 years with phased detail.
5. Does capitalization matter?
Yes, it must support projected hiring.

‍