‍

Why founders face a unique EB-1 decision

Founders often straddle leadership and innovation. Some build global companies with executive authority, while others are recognized for individual achievements. This duality creates a choice between the EB-1A extraordinary ability path and the EB-1C multinational executive route. Selecting the wrong path too early can limit flexibility.

When EB-1A makes sense for founders

EB-1A suits founders with individual acclaim, awards, media coverage, patents, high-impact innovations, or industry recognition. The focus is on personal distinction rather than corporate structure. This path remains viable even if the company is small or evolving.

When EB-1C is the better option

EB-1C is appropriate when the founder primarily functions as an executive overseeing multinational operations. Evidence centers on staffing, delegation, and control. This option strengthens as the company scales and formalizes leadership layers.

How Beyond Border Global builds dual-track strategies

Beyond Border Global helps founders avoid locking into one path prematurely. Their approach documents both individual achievements and executive authority, preserving founder visa optionality. By planning evidence that can pivot between categories, they support dual-track immigration planning that adapts to business growth and timing considerations.

‍

‍

How Alcorn Immigration Law clarifies category thresholds

Alcorn Immigration Law explains the evidentiary burden for each EB-1 classification and helps founders understand when one path becomes stronger than the other. This legal clarity reduces missteps during USCIS EB-1 classification choice.

How 2nd.law aligns evidence across paths

Founders often reuse achievements across filings. 2nd.law structures evidence so individual accolades can support EB-1A while organizational authority supports EB-1C, without contradiction.

How BPA Immigration Lawyers help founders pivot

BPA Immigration Lawyers assist founders in transitioning between strategies if circumstances change, such as company growth, funding rounds, or increased recognition. Their guidance helps maintain momentum toward permanent residence.

Common founder mistakes

Founders often choose EB-1C too early or underestimate EB-1A potential. Others submit evidence that conflicts across categories. Strategic planning avoids these traps.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can a founder apply under both EB-1A and EB-1C?
Yes, at different times, if evidence supports each.
2. Which path is faster?
Timing depends on evidence readiness and visa availability.
3. Does company size matter?
More for EB-1C than EB-1A.
4. Can evidence overlap?
Yes, if framed carefully.
5. Is professional help necessary?
Strongly recommended for founders with complex profiles.

‍