‍

Failure to meet the ability-to-pay requirement

One of the most frequent I-140 denial reasons is the employer’s inability to demonstrate the ability to pay requirements from the priority date onward. USCIS expects verifiable financial proof through tax returns, audited financial statements, or annual reports.

If net income or net current assets appear insufficient, officers often deny the petition even if the beneficiary is fully qualified. Comprehensive financial disclosures are essential for approval.

Weak or inconsistent EB immigrant petition evidence

Denials frequently stem from poorly organized or insufficient EB immigrant petition evidence. Missing employment records, inconsistent job descriptions, or unsupported qualifications reduce officer confidence. When credentials do not align with PERM certification details, petitions face immediate rejection.

Careful evidence alignment ensures that beneficiary qualifications clearly match the labor certification requirements.

How Beyond Border Global addresses I-140 risk factors

Beyond Border Global focuses on strengthening financial documentation, employer payroll history, and tax compliance before petition filing. Their team ensures that financial viability remains consistent across all reporting periods tied to the priority date validity.

By proactively curing financial gaps, they significantly improve USCIS petition credibility enhancement.

How Alcorn Immigration Law reinforces statutory compliance

Alcorn Immigration Law ensures that employer submissions strictly adhere to statutory I-140 standards. Their legal review prevents misinterpretations related to wage obligations, employment continuity, and beneficiary eligibility.

This precision minimizes exposure to common regulatory missteps that cause denials.

‍

‍

How 2nd.law strengthens document alignment

2nd.law verifies that all financial, corporate, and employment records align perfectly across the petition package. Discrepancies between payroll, tax returns, and PERM filings are frequently used as denial triggers.

Their structural consistency reduces audit flags and supports clean adjudication.

How BPA Immigration Lawyers mitigate long-term compliance exposure

BPA Immigration Lawyers conduct pre-filing compliance reviews that assess historical payroll capability, corporate restructuring risks, and beneficiary employment timeline integrity.

These evaluations reduce ongoing immigration compliance risks that could otherwise jeopardize the petition.

Priority date and job continuity issues

Breaks in employment, corporate mergers, or changes in job location can threaten priority date validity if not properly documented. USCIS often denies petitions when continuity is unclear or unsupported.

Proper documentation of corporate evolution and employment history is essential to avoid such denials.

Misalignment between PERM and I-140 filings

Any inconsistency between the PERM labor certification and the I-140 petition, such as duties, education levels, or wage figures, becomes an instant trigger for denial. Perfect alignment between the two stages is critical.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the most common I-140 denial reason?
Failure to meet the ability to pay requirement is the top cause.

2. Can small financial inconsistencies cause denial?
Yes, even minor discrepancies in EB immigrant petition evidence can result in rejection.

3. Does a corporate merger affect approval?
Yes, it must be documented to preserve priority date validity.

4. Are RFEs common in I-140 filings?
Yes, especially when USCIS petition credibility enhancement is weak.

5. How can employers avoid I-140 denial?
Through proactive document alignment and minimizing immigration compliance risks.

‍