Master the third EB-2 NIW prong arguing it benefits America to waive job offer requirements. Balancing test strategies and evidence explained.
The on balance benefits United States standard asks whether America benefits more from granting you a green card without job offer requirements than from requiring you to go through labor certification. This USCIS balancing test weighs national interests in having you pursue your endeavor against interests in protecting American workers from foreign competition. The third prong recognizes these are competing interests and requires you to prove the balance tips in favor of waiving requirements.
Matter of Dhanasar explains that petitioners should articulate factors demonstrating waiving requirements would benefit the United States. The decision doesn't prescribe specific factors - each case presents unique circumstances. However, common themes emerge from successful cases. Urgency matters - if your work addresses time-sensitive problems, delays from labor certification could reduce benefits. Flexibility matters - if your endeavor requires changing employers or starting companies, job offer requirements would be impractical.
The balancing isn't about proving no US workers exist who could do your work. That's what labor certification tests. Instead, you're arguing that testing the labor market through PERM would harm national interests more than it protects worker interests. Perhaps your entrepreneurial endeavor creates more jobs than it takes. Maybe your research benefits all Americans regardless of whether US researchers could theoretically do it. You might be positioned so uniquely that labor market testing would be meaningless. Frame arguments around why the waiver serves America better than traditional processes.
Struggling with the balancing argument? Beyond Border helps you develop third prong arguments that address competing interests effectively.
Demonstrating urgency strengthens EB-2 NIW third prong arguments by showing delays from labor certification would harm national interests. If you're working on time-sensitive problems, explain why immediate action matters. Perhaps you're addressing emerging threats like cybersecurity vulnerabilities or pandemic response needs. Maybe you're pursuing rapidly evolving opportunities in competitive global markets. Your research might tackle urgent health crises requiring immediate attention.
Document the time-sensitive nature of your work through expert statements, policy documents, or industry reports. If government agencies have declared your work area a priority requiring urgent action, cite these declarations. If competitors globally are racing in your field, explain how delays would harm American competitiveness. If vulnerable populations need your services immediately, detail the current unmet needs and consequences of delays in addressing them at USCIS.
Calculate actual timeline impacts. Labor certification takes 8-18 months typically. Explain concretely what happens during those months if you can't pursue your endeavor. Lost research opportunities, delayed product launches, unserved patient populations, or competitive disadvantages all represent costs from delay. Quantify these costs when possible. The goal is proving that forcing you through labor certification imposes greater costs on America than the potential harm to workers from waiving the requirement.
Need help articulating urgency arguments? Beyond Border helps you demonstrate time-sensitivity of your endeavor.
The balancing test NIW heavily favors petitioners whose endeavors require flexibility incompatible with job offer requirements. Entrepreneurs and founders present perhaps the strongest third prong cases because requiring job offers for people starting their own companies makes no sense logically. You can't be your own sponsoring employer for traditional EB-2. Your business venture by nature involves self-employment rather than working for an established employer willing to sponsor you.
Researchers and professionals whose work requires changing institutions or pursuing diverse opportunities also have strong flexibility arguments. Perhaps your research requires collaborating across multiple universities. Maybe your field values mobility between industry and academia. You might work as consultant serving various clients rather than single employer. These career patterns are incompatible with job-offer-based immigration processes. Explain how your field operates and why job offer requirements would force artificial constraints on your work.
The flexibility to change employers without jeopardizing immigration status benefits not just you but America broadly. You can pursue the most impactful opportunities as they arise rather than staying at one employer solely for visa reasons. You can start companies creating jobs for Americans. You can collaborate with whomever advances your work most effectively. This flexibility maximizes your contributions to national interests rather than constraining them through arbitrary immigration requirements at USCIS.
Building flexibility-based arguments? Beyond Border helps you articulate how job offer requirements would constrain your nationally important work.
Strong waiving job offer justification often involves demonstrating that your work creates more opportunities for American workers than it potentially displaces. Entrepreneurs founding companies create jobs - this is straightforward economic benefit. Detail your hiring plans, projected employee counts, and types of positions you'll create. If your business plan shows hiring 10 American workers, this clearly outweighs any single position you might occupy.
Technology developers enabling new industries or capabilities create economic multiplier effects. Perhaps your invention will spawn entire product categories employing thousands. Your research might enable breakthroughs leading to new treatment protocols requiring more healthcare workers. Your business model might create marketplace platforms connecting service providers with customers, generating economic activity beyond your company. Explain these multiplier effects showing broader economic benefits to America.
Even if you're not directly creating jobs, your work might enable American companies to compete globally or grow domestically. Technology that improves productivity lets companies expand. Research that maintains American leadership in strategic fields protects existing industries. Clinical work improving health outcomes reduces costs systemwide. Frame your contributions within broader economic contexts showing how your work strengthens American prosperity beyond just your individual employment.
Developing economic benefit arguments? Beyond Border helps you articulate job creation and economic impacts of your endeavor.
The concept of unique positioning supports national benefit vs labor protection balancing by arguing you're so specifically suited to your endeavor that labor market testing would be meaningless. Perhaps your unique combination of technical expertise, language skills, and cultural understanding positions you distinctly for work connecting US and foreign markets. Your particular research background might give you insights others lack. Your entrepreneurial track record in specific markets might be truly unusual.
Document your unique positioning through comparisons and third-party validation. If experts in your field state your particular combination of skills or experiences is rare, include their letters. If your background combines elements unusual in your field - perhaps engineering expertise plus medical knowledge plus business experience - explain why this combination matters for your specific endeavor. The goal isn't claiming you're the only person capable, but rather showing your particular positioning is sufficiently unique that standard labor market testing wouldn't effectively identify substitutes.
Unique positioning arguments work especially well combined with other third prong factors. Perhaps you're uniquely positioned AND your work is urgent AND you're creating jobs. Multiple factors reinforce each other creating compelling overall arguments that balance favors waiver. Don't rely solely on uniqueness claims but use them to strengthen broader balancing arguments at USCIS.
Articulating your unique positioning? Beyond Border helps you develop and document distinctive capabilities relevant to your endeavor.
Effective Matter of Dhanasar balancing arguments acknowledge labor protection interests rather than ignoring them. Show you understand that job offer requirements exist to protect American workers and that these protections matter. Then explain why in your specific case, national interests in waiving requirements outweigh protection interests. This balanced approach demonstrates sophisticated understanding rather than dismissive attitude toward worker protections.
Address directly whether US workers could do your proposed work. If US workers definitely exist in your field, explain why labor certification would be impractical given your endeavor's nature. Perhaps you're starting a company where you can't be your own sponsor. Maybe your work requires flexibility incompatible with fixed job offers. If US workers might be scarce in your specialty, document the shortage through labor statistics or expert statements about workforce needs.
Frame your arguments positively around benefits rather than negatively attacking labor certification. Instead of "labor certification is bureaucratic and unnecessary," state "waiving job offer requirements enables me to pursue entrepreneurial work that creates 10 jobs for American workers while advancing nationally important objectives." The positive framing emphasizes how waiver serves national interests rather than simply criticizing existing processes at USCIS.
Crafting balanced third prong arguments? Beyond Border helps you address worker protection concerns while demonstrating national benefits of waiver.
What does "on balance" mean for EB-2 NIW? It means weighing national benefits of waiving job offer requirements against interests in protecting US workers, with benefits needing to outweigh protection interests overall.
Do I need to prove no US workers can do my job? No, that's labor certification's purpose - instead prove that waiving job offer requirements serves national interests better than requiring traditional labor market testing.
How do entrepreneurs satisfy the third prong? Entrepreneurs argue job offer requirements are impractical for self-employment, their ventures create American jobs, and their work serves national interests better without sponsorship constraints.
Can employees satisfy third prong or just entrepreneurs? Both can succeed - employees argue urgency, flexibility needs, unique positioning, or that their work's national importance outweighs any potential labor market impacts.
.jpeg)
