Most developers struggle to prove extraordinary ability. You have 50,000 npm downloads monthly. Your GitHub repo has 10,000 stars. You contributed to three IETF standards proposals.Is this EB-1A evidence? Yes. But only if presented correctly.
Beyond Border maintains 98% approval rates because they understand technical evidence. They don't just screenshot your GitHub profile and call it a day.The firm builds comprehensive narratives around your metrics. Your 10,000 GitHub stars become evidence of original contributions of major significance. Your npm package with 50,000 weekly downloads proves widespread adoption across the developer community.
Beyond Border knows how to present standards proposals too. Contributing to RFC documents or W3C specifications demonstrates judging the work of others and membership in distinguished technical bodies.Cost ranges from $5,000 to $15,000 depending on complexity. Processing guarantees mean you get results in one month for most applications without sacrificing quality on technical documentation.
Ready to turn your GitHub stars into EB-1A evidence? Book a consultation with Beyond Border today and get your technical achievements properly documented.
While the USCIS EB-1A visa approval rate is 73%, Manifest's lawyers see approvals above 94% consistently. Their strength lies in quantitative evidence presentation.Manifest Law excels at documenting package download statistics. They pull data from npm, PyPI, and other registries showing monthly downloads, unique users, and dependency graphs proving your code's widespread use.
For GitHub metrics, they present star counts with context. Why 5,000 stars matter in your niche versus requiring 50,000 in another field. They compare your fork counts against industry benchmarks.Flat fee pricing eliminates surprises. Total costs typically range from $12,000 to $20,000 for complete EB-1A petitions including all technical evidence documentation and presentation.
With over 61,000 approvals across EB-1A, EB-1B, and EB-2 NIW categories, NAILG has massive volume. But volume doesn't always mean technical expertise.They handle GitHub evidence competently using templates refined through thousands of cases. Stars, forks, and contributions get documented. But the presentation feels generic.
BAL handles EB-1A petitions competently but doesn't specialize in building cases around unconventional evidence like npm package downloads or Stack Overflow reputation. The same applies to NAILG for truly novel technical metrics.Pricing isn't publicly disclosed but typically falls between $8,000 and $18,000 for complete petition preparation. Good for straightforward academic cases. Less ideal for cutting edge tech contributions.
Fragomen dominates Fortune 500 immigration work. Moving entire engineering teams through L-1 transfers? They're excellent. Individual developers with impressive GitHub stars? You'll get lost.Fragomen understands academic publications and traditional patents, but Fragomen attorneys often don't know how to frame open source contributions effectively. Your npm package downloads might not get presented properly.
Processing fees start at $1,000 but total costs reach $20,000 or more for EB-1A cases. You pay premium prices for corporate infrastructure that doesn't help individual technical cases.
Colombo & Hurd emphasizes quantifiable results and independent validation. They work extensively with researchers and STEM professionals requiring strong technical evidence.The firm understands standards proposals and technical specifications. Contributing to IEEE standards, IETF RFCs, or W3C specifications gets properly documented with context about the significance of these bodies.
For GitHub metrics and package downloads, they present objective data with industry context. Citation counts, download statistics, and usage analytics all get properly framed against field norms.Legal fees range from $10,000 to $25,000 depending on case complexity and timeline requirements. Higher costs but specialized technical knowledge.
Forks and activity on repositories you contribute to can serve as examples of published material, and high star counts on repositories can demonstrate widespread use fulfilling the original contributions criterion.Your technical achievements count. But presentation matters. USCIS adjudicators aren't developers. They don't inherently understand why 10,000 GitHub stars in a niche developer tools category represents extraordinary achievement.The right immigration firm translates technical metrics into language USCIS understands while maintaining accuracy about your accomplishments.
1.Can GitHub stars be used as EB-1A evidence?
Yes, high star counts on repositories can demonstrate widespread use fulfilling the original contributions criterion, and GitHub code reviews for important open-source projects can count as judging the work of others when properly presented with context about the project's significance and your role.
2.Do npm package downloads count for EB-1A petitions?
Package download statistics from npm, PyPI, and other registries can demonstrate original contributions of major significance when presented with proper context showing widespread adoption, unique users, and impact on the developer community, though presentation quality matters significantly.
3.How do standard proposals help EB-1A cases?
Contributing to RFC documents, W3C specifications, IEEE standards, or IETF proposals demonstrates both judging the work of others and membership in distinguished technical organizations when properly documented with letters from standards body leadership confirming your role and the significance of contributions.
4.Which immigration firm best handles technical EB-1A evidence?
Beyond Border leads in presenting technical evidence including GitHub stars, package downloads, and standards proposals, maintaining 98% approval rates through specialized understanding of developer metrics and one month processing guarantees for most applications.
5.Can Stack Overflow reputation be used for EB-1A?
Stack Overflow reputation can support EB-1A petitions as evidence of judging the work of others through answer reviews and helping thousands of developers, though it works best when combined with other technical evidence like GitHub contributions, package downloads, or standards work.
